<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earn Online Cash with .Info Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/</link>
	<description>How To Earn Cash Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:18:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-974</guid>
		<description>i am using .info domains for my proxy sites....
infact i have two proxy sites with same domain name
one is .com &amp; other .info
surprising thing is that both where promoted well 
but my .info site gets better traffic than .com site :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am using .info domains for my proxy sites&#8230;.<br />
infact i have two proxy sites with same domain name<br />
one is .com &amp; other .info<br />
surprising thing is that both where promoted well<br />
but my .info site gets better traffic than .com site <img src='http://onlinecashgenerator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Carr</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Hi Ash,

Sorry, but Google doesn&#039;t apply any blanket penalty to .infos. There are simply too many .info domains that rank well, including several that I own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ash,</p>
<p>Sorry, but Google doesn&#8217;t apply any blanket penalty to .infos. There are simply too many .info domains that rank well, including several that I own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB Predator Review Luis</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>CB Predator Review Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Great detailed info about info domains.
I agre comletely with what you said, and the only problem would be if you were to brand your doain name, then a .com is better since its more widely known.
Great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great detailed info about info domains.<br />
I agre comletely with what you said, and the only problem would be if you were to brand your doain name, then a .com is better since its more widely known.<br />
Great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-845</guid>
		<description>In the past when I&#039;ve used dot info domains they always seemed to fail, my sites generally started to rise in the rankings once I changed the domain name to a dot com.
Im sure google penalizes dot info&#039;s, allthough now google are doing a major revamp on how the search engines work, who knows what will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past when I&#8217;ve used dot info domains they always seemed to fail, my sites generally started to rise in the rankings once I changed the domain name to a dot com.<br />
Im sure google penalizes dot info&#8217;s, allthough now google are doing a major revamp on how the search engines work, who knows what will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-838</guid>
		<description>Yes I guessed that, it&#039;s good that you cleared some stuff up, as I has some misconceptions about the .info&#039;s as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I guessed that, it&#8217;s good that you cleared some stuff up, as I has some misconceptions about the .info&#8217;s as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Nice long article Frank and all true in my testings with .info domains and making affiliate sites for searchers. You know my best performing site is a .info. Which probably tells that I have been promoting the wrong site in the begining ;)

It&#039;s also fun to test different keywords with cheap domains because of the fresh domain bonus. After they go into sandbox you&#039;ll know pretty well what keywords are easy to rank and get decent traffic and the try to find an aged domain or go for exact match keyword rich .com domain :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice long article Frank and all true in my testings with .info domains and making affiliate sites for searchers. You know my best performing site is a .info. Which probably tells that I have been promoting the wrong site in the begining <img src='http://onlinecashgenerator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also fun to test different keywords with cheap domains because of the fresh domain bonus. After they go into sandbox you&#8217;ll know pretty well what keywords are easy to rank and get decent traffic and the try to find an aged domain or go for exact match keyword rich .com domain <img src='http://onlinecashgenerator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Carr</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Hi JR,

I&#039;ve been working on developing niche sites and doing local contract work since last summer. As you might guess, a lot of the niche sites are on .info domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JR,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been working on developing niche sites and doing local contract work since last summer. As you might guess, a lot of the niche sites are on .info domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank, I was wondering where you&#039;ve been, and I guess I was the dummy who did not know about this blog. Good to read stuff here, just subscribed. I hope all is well with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank, I was wondering where you&#8217;ve been, and I guess I was the dummy who did not know about this blog. Good to read stuff here, just subscribed. I hope all is well with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Carr</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Hi Calvin,

Well, I could post a big rant about why Google&#039;s impression of what&#039;s quality search results and what ours might be are so different. Basically, it boils down to them cutting small time affiliate marketers out of the SEO and the PPC (Adwords) markets as best they can because doing so means more money for them. It&#039;s not fair but that&#039;s life. The message is increasingly becoming, &quot;Go Big, Go Branded or Go Home&quot;

Is the small niche site dead? No, I don&#039;t think so. There are ways to still compete on a shoestring budget. However, it clearly isn&#039;t as easy as it was 5-6 years ago when the market was less mature. Content aggregation is certainly one effective method although there are some right ways and wrong ways to do this.

On Wayback machine, it&#039;s probably the best choice even though it isn&#039;t complete. Other domain information sites may have thumbnails of the previous site, should it exist. You can also check domain registration details and see if it has been previously registered. From there, you can make some guesses about how it was used. For example, product related .info domains that were registered in early 2008 and dropped in early 2009 were very likely to have been used by someone doing the &quot;100 BANS sites&quot; campaign.

Also .info domain names with buying keyword names should invite extra scrutiny on your part before purchasing them. For example, you need to do some good research when buying new domains, .info or otherwise, starting with words like &quot;cheap&quot;, &quot;discount&quot; or &quot;vintage&quot; or that have &quot;review(s)&quot; or &quot;store&quot; after the keyword.  I&#039;d recommend that you go with more social extra words is the exact match keyword name isn&#039;t available, for example, &quot;widgetblog.info&quot;, &quot;mywidget.info&quot; or &quot;widgetfan.info&quot;, or brand-like names such as &quot;widgetplanet.info&quot;, &quot;widgetdepot.info&quot; or &quot;thewidgetplace.info&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Calvin,</p>
<p>Well, I could post a big rant about why Google&#8217;s impression of what&#8217;s quality search results and what ours might be are so different. Basically, it boils down to them cutting small time affiliate marketers out of the SEO and the PPC (Adwords) markets as best they can because doing so means more money for them. It&#8217;s not fair but that&#8217;s life. The message is increasingly becoming, &#8220;Go Big, Go Branded or Go Home&#8221;</p>
<p>Is the small niche site dead? No, I don&#8217;t think so. There are ways to still compete on a shoestring budget. However, it clearly isn&#8217;t as easy as it was 5-6 years ago when the market was less mature. Content aggregation is certainly one effective method although there are some right ways and wrong ways to do this.</p>
<p>On Wayback machine, it&#8217;s probably the best choice even though it isn&#8217;t complete. Other domain information sites may have thumbnails of the previous site, should it exist. You can also check domain registration details and see if it has been previously registered. From there, you can make some guesses about how it was used. For example, product related .info domains that were registered in early 2008 and dropped in early 2009 were very likely to have been used by someone doing the &#8220;100 BANS sites&#8221; campaign.</p>
<p>Also .info domain names with buying keyword names should invite extra scrutiny on your part before purchasing them. For example, you need to do some good research when buying new domains, .info or otherwise, starting with words like &#8220;cheap&#8221;, &#8220;discount&#8221; or &#8220;vintage&#8221; or that have &#8220;review(s)&#8221; or &#8220;store&#8221; after the keyword.  I&#8217;d recommend that you go with more social extra words is the exact match keyword name isn&#8217;t available, for example, &#8220;widgetblog.info&#8221;, &#8220;mywidget.info&#8221; or &#8220;widgetfan.info&#8221;, or brand-like names such as &#8220;widgetplanet.info&#8221;, &#8220;widgetdepot.info&#8221; or &#8220;thewidgetplace.info&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hospitalera</title>
		<link>http://onlinecashgenerator.com/seo/earn-online-cash-with-info-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>hospitalera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecashgenerator.com/?p=186#comment-830</guid>
		<description>You put beautifully in words what I &quot;knew&quot; in my guts ;-) I have a few .info domains and sites myself and they rank well for their keywords or not depending how much work I put into them, not because they have a certain tld or not. I especially like them for travel / location sites ;-) SY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You put beautifully in words what I &#8220;knew&#8221; in my guts <img src='http://onlinecashgenerator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I have a few .info domains and sites myself and they rank well for their keywords or not depending how much work I put into them, not because they have a certain tld or not. I especially like them for travel / location sites <img src='http://onlinecashgenerator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  SY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

